…directs Defence Counsel to trace defendant’s whereabouts
The Akwa Ibom State High Court sitting in Uyo has revoked the bail earlier granted to one of the defendants standing trial over the alleged rape of a 13-year-old boy.
The ruling was delivered on Tuesday, February 24, 2026, in Suit No. HU/41c/2025 by Justice Okon Okon, following developments surrounding the absence of one of the defendants in court.
Defence counsel, Barr. Ifeanyi Idika, had sought to withdraw his appearance from the matter, citing issues relating to his client’s failure to consistently appear in court. However, the court declined the request and instead directed the counsel to follow up on the whereabouts of the defendant and ensure his presence in subsequent proceedings.
The affected defendant, Mr. David Udoh James, is one of seven men facing prosecution in connection with the alleged sexual assault of a Junior Secondary School student (name withheld) from Etoi community in Uyo Local Government Area of Akwa Ibom State.
The other defendants standing trial are: Okwudili Levi Okeke (popularly known as Eze Anambra), Idara Itam Daniel, Daniel Jacob Edet, Udofia Edem Udosen, David Bassey Bassey and Nsikak Emmanuel Ben.
In addition to revoking the bail, the court ordered the surety to produce the defendant in court on March 10, 2026, when the matter is scheduled to come up again. The court further directed that the surety must appear alongside the defendant on that date, warning that failure to produce the accused person would attract legal consequences.
The proceedings were closely monitored by journalists, as the case continues to draw widespread public attention across Akwa Ibom State.
Background of the Case
The case gained prominence after allegations emerged that the minor was subjected to repeated sexual abuse over several years, beginning from his primary school days.
According to earlier accounts gathered by journalists, the victim alleged that he was initially lured by a night security guard attached to QIC School, Etoi, and later introduced to other adult men who allegedly participated in the abuse. The suspects reportedly threatened him to prevent disclosure.
The alleged abuse reportedly came to light after the boy’s health condition deteriorated, prompting his parents to demand explanations. Medical examinations were subsequently conducted as part of the investigation process.
The victim’s mother had earlier appealed for assistance, citing financial challenges that initially hindered the family from pursuing the case. Community stakeholders have also called on the state government to ensure justice for the minor and strengthen child protection mechanisms.
Following police intervention, the suspects were arrested and charged to court.
With the revocation of bail, the directive to the surety, and the court’s instruction to defence counsel to ascertain the defendant’s whereabouts, the matter is expected to resume on March 10, 2026, as the court moves to ensure strict compliance with its orders and the continued prosecution of the case.
